Letter to the Editor


Letter to the Editor


Date: March 15, 2012
by: Observer Staff



+ ‘Free’ contraception isn’t free
Dear Editor:

Who does President Obama think he is? What gives him the right to tell people that they must pay for the recreational sex of other people?

That is exactly what he is attempting to do with the requirement that insurance companies must pay for contraception.

Keep in mind that we are not talking about sex for procreation here. We are talking about “sex without consequences.”

I was raised with a mandate for personal responsibility. If I do something, I expect to take the consequences of my actions. My parents inculcated this in me. Indeed, a person with character will be able to defer gratification and exercise self-control.

Mr. Obama is not talking about health; he is only interested in having responsible people subsidize the recreational activities of irresponsible people. I happen to like skiing. I do not, however, ask other people to pay for my lift ticket (pun intended). Do we really want to subsidize irresponsibility?

Second, contraceptives are not insurable. Mr. Obama does not understand what insurance is. It is to cover an expense, usually large, caused by something outside the control of the insured party. Sexual activity is not uncontrollable. Further, contraception is a regular, ongoing expense not caused by some disaster; it is certainly not akin to an earthquake. People who cannot afford contraception are not appropriately engaging in sex; they are not mature enough.

Now, nothing in the above is intended to argue that consenting adults should not be allowed to do what they want. They, if they are adults, should be able to purchase the contraceptives they want to. Profit-seeking drug stores will sell them if government allows such sales, which, clearly, it should. It is probable that competitive markets will even result in lower costs than the roughly $100 per year for the pills or $1 per condom currently prevailing.

I would suggest that Mr. Obama’s push for “free” contraception (which is never free since there are costs to be paid by somebody) is simply because he wants to shift wealth from producers to non-producers.
Lawrence Southwick
Ph.D., Economics

+ Dorfman wrong about Main Street
Dear Editor:

I am sorry to tell Richard Dorfman, but Main Street is drab (Feb. 15 guest column).

We have been vacationing here for the past five years and have seen no change for the better on Main Street. If it weren’t for the special events held downtown, the streets would be empty, or nearly so.

The Selby Public Library/Sarasota Opera area is lovely, and Burns Square is great. In fact, Burns Court is funky. Main Street is just old and unappealing. Without some updating for Main Street, I think Dorfman will be waiting a long while for, as he said, “the time when our sidewalks are overcrowded with shoppers, etc.”  

But, in general, Sarasota is beautiful, and we will continue to spend as much time as possible in the city, just not on Main Street, alas.
Elaine Gallinaro
Cape Cod, Mass.


Login Register now

Currently 1 Response

  • 1.
  • Dear Mr. Southwick,
    Will all due respect, I'd rather pay for contraception than pay the ongoing cost of another child on welfare, the ongoing cost of another court-appointed attorney to defend a dead-beat dad, the ongoing cost of another judge to hear such a case, the ongoing cost of another inmate jailed for non-payment of child support, the ongoing cost of another child born with HIV, the ongoing cost of another child in foster care, and the ongoing cost of another child in an orphanage. It seemed to me that your $100 a year economic estimate is using what former President Bush [notice I use capitals when referring to the Office of the Presidency, unlike the wall street journal] called "fuzzy math."

    Dear Ms. Gallinaro,
    While I'm sure that you are a perfectly sweet, mature women, and as such, your opinion is valid, it is after all, just your opinion. One with which I disagree. The streets of downtown Sarasota, including Main Street, are most definitely not empty nor nearly empty when not hosting special events. There are many wonderful items to be found behind these drab facades, if you choose to actually shop downtown, rather than take just advantage of our cultural highlights. Yes, there is need for improvement, just like the City of Truro, Cape Cod needs your active support in renovating its derelict properties.
  • Dan Christian
    Mon 19th Mar 2012
    at 6:53pm
Login below to post a comment or click register.
Account E-Mail
forgot password? click here
Speak Your Mind Below!


Subscribe to our eNewsletters
1970 Main Street, Sarasota, FL 34236 941-366-3468

Copyright 2015 The Observer Group Inc., All Rights Reserved