City of Sarasota commission approves anti-panhandling ordinance


City of Sarasota commission approves anti-panhandling ordinance


Date: April 23, 2013
by: Roger Drouin | City Editor




In a 4-1 vote, city commissioners approved an ordinance prohibiting people from panhandling along a public road.

The new law, which was approved on second reading Tuesday afternoon, would replace a repealed ordinance, called ordinance 23-1, that prohibited panhandlers from using signs to ask motorists for money.

The law designed to curb panhandling in the city will become effective April 29. Mayor Suzanne Atwell said the proliferation of people panhandling at nearly every busy intersection “is not a good presentation of the community.”

City commissioners heard from a half-dozen residents speaking about the need for a solicitation ordinance. They also heard from paralegal Michael Barfield, the legal chair of the Sarasota chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), who said the law could be challenged as unconstitutional.

“I don’t think the ACLU will ever say they are happy with anything the city will do about solicitation," said City Attorney Bob Fournier. “And I am not ready to say we throw in the towel because we can’t write an ordinance that is constitutional, because I believe we can.”

The ordinance approved Tuesday is largely modeled after a similar law in St. Petersburg.

“It is what the city of St. Petersburg did, and that survived a legal challenge,” Fournier said.

Barfield, however, argued the new ordinance was too much, and individuals who were not soliciting motorists could nonetheless be issued a citation because an officer could infer intent, as the new law is written.

“We don’t protect the right of the panhandler,” Barfield said. “We protect the rights of everyone.”
Before the vote, downtown restaurant owner Jim Sullivan said the panhandling issue has grown out of control, and he pleaded with commissioners to do something.

“It’s a problem, and I don’t see it lessening,” Sullivan told commissioners before their vote Tuesday. “I don’t know what the solution is. I have real estate agents who wont bring clients into my restaurant because of the homeless population at that corner.”

Atwell, along with Commissioners Terry Turner, Willie Shaw and Paul Caragiulo voted to approve the ordinance — with Commissioner Shannon Snyder voting No.

The law would not prohibit someone standing along the road advertising for a business or campaigning for a local candidate. “But they cannot ask for money,” Fournier said.

City Commissioners also:
• Discussed a proposed moratorium on approval of conditional use permits for bars, taverns and nightclubs.

Commissioners did not vote on the moratorium, instead deciding to focus on trying to seek “long term” solutions to downtown sound issues. The topic is scheduled for another discussion at the upcoming May 6 City Commission meeting.



Login Register now

Currently 2 Responses

  • 1.
  • I heard from officials that these people make a lot of money every day from unsuspecting good samaritans and they promptly use it to buy drugs, alcohol or some herb that they smoke in the 5 Points Park, after their shift of begging. Giving them money prolongs their problem. They have free food, phones, Social Security Disability, Food Stamps (which they sell), medicaid, etc, etc. The police and Salvation Army try hard to get them back into society but they don't want to and are extremely beligerant. Some have homes to go back to but would rather take their drug of choice. They need bootcamp.
  • Judy Hummer
    Wed 24th Apr 2013
    at 3:24pm
  • 2.
  • To hell with the ACLU--American Civil Lunacy Unlimited--and their crusade for the bums (oh, I forgot, "the homeless"). Where's their crusade for the great majority of hard working, law abiding people who simply want to left at peace. Here's a thought. The bums advertise their plight on card board signs but has anyone ever investigated the accuracy of their advertisements? I mean, are their ads true? If not, they should be arrested and prosecuted for false advertising as any other business would be. After all, they are independent contractors who receive benefits (free medical) yet pay no taxes on their earnings. It's about time the bums are held to the same standards as all other working stiffs.
  • Milan Adrian
    Tue 23rd Apr 2013
    at 10:03pm
Login below to post a comment or click register.
Account E-Mail
forgot password? click here
Speak Your Mind Below!


Subscribe to our eNewsletters
1970 Main Street, Sarasota, FL 34236 941-366-3468

Copyright 2014 The Observer Group Inc., All Rights Reserved