Town, county crack open Beer Can dispute

 

Town, county crack open Beer Can dispute

 

Date: July 24, 2013
by: Kurt Schultheis | Managing Editor

 
 

 

A petition for an administrative review of permits for three sand structures near the north end of Longboat Key has also ignited a longstanding debate about who is responsible for the swath of sand known as Beer Can Island.

The Florida Department of Environmental Protection has issued a notice of intent to permit the construction of three north-end groins, one of which would be located on Beer Can Island.

But former Manatee County Commissioner Joe McClash sent a notice that he has petitioned the state’s Office of General Counsel of the Department of Environmental Protection for a review of the permit. Key resident Gene Jaleski also filed a petition dated July 5. The petitions have prompted the town attorney to engage special environmental legal counsel to defend the petition as the state evaluates the petitions.

The petitions describe McClash and Jaleski as persons “whose substantial interests are affected by the department’s action.”

“The installation of man-made structures was done without proper notice and will harm the recreation lands used not only by Joe McClash, but thousands who have not had the benefit of knowing about this permit action,” McClash’s petition states.

McClash’s petition has prompted other Manatee County residents to respond to the Manatee County Board of County Commissioners. Commissioners, though, are sending any responses they receive directly to the town and have even received opinions from their legal counsel stating the county has no involvement in the matter.

Assistant Manatee County attorney Bill Clague sent an email to Manatee County Commissioner Larry Bustle in July, which states, “The municipal boundaries of the town of Longboat Key extend into the surrounding waters well beyond the limits of this project, such that under Florida law, the county does not have jurisdiction over the matter.”

Although the town is paying to permit three structures, only two of those structures are being permitted on town property, according to town officials.

Two structures are being placed to hold sand in front of two condominiums that have no beach at high tide and no coastal defense from a storm.

But the third groin is a terminal groin that would stick out into Longboat Pass on Beer Can Island.

Although the town picks up excessive trash on its sand and even has a plan in place to rescue people in need from its shore, town officials have taken the stance for years they don’t own the island, and property records back up their stance.

Charlie Hunsicker, Manatee County’s Director of Conservation Lands Management, told the Longboat Observer in 2009 that he has witnessed the pass of ownership between the county and the town since 1977.

“The bottom line is Beer Can Island is under the political jurisdiction and control of the town,” Hunsicker said in 2009. “The town controls that area in the same manner as the county’s activities are under regulatory authority of the city of Bradenton Beach for Coquina Beach.”

And, in a July 11 email to Bustle, Hunsicker wrote: “Because (all of) the structures are indeed located within and under the jurisdiction of the town of Longboat Key, the county does not have authority under its own ordinances to regulate, control, permit or not permit these structures.”

When asked to respond to the county attorney’s assessment and Hunsicker’s statements last week, Town Manager Dave Bullock grabbed a blue binder on his desk labeled “Beer Can Island” and pointed to property lines that show the town’s jurisdiction ending at Beer Can Island.

“There isn’t any controversy,” Bullock said. “It’s crystal clear in Manatee County records and historical documents that the county owns this property.”

The debate could intensify if the structures are permitted and the town seeks a monetary contribution from Manatee County to build a structure on Beer Can Island.

Bullock said the two groins in front of Longboat Key properties are more important and that the groin on Beer Can Island is less important because it wouldn’t be placed on town property.

“I want the smallest footprint possible for these structures,” Bullock said.

Contact Kurt Schultheis at kschulthies@yourobserver.com.


Beer Can Island Background

Mohamed Dabees, of Humiston and Moore Engineers, performed a regional model study for Longboat Pass and Sarasota Bay in 2008.

Dabees’ 114-page study spends 37 pages on Longboat Pass alone, depicting the history of the pass and how it has evolved since the 1800s.

The study states that when the pass opened in 1880, north of a previous inlet location, the south end of Anna Maria Island began to erode, while the sand moved and began to form at the north end of Longboat Key, which became what is now Greer Island, aka Beer Can Island.

And, after construction of the jetty in the 1950s, the north end of Longboat Key began to erode and Beer Can Island began to break away from Longboat Key.

By 1970, however, sand bypassing was re-established, and Beer Can Island became reattached to Longboat Key.

But recently, Beer Can Island has become difficult to access by foot. Depending on the tide, beachgoers can get trapped on the island and are forced to swim back to Longboat Key.

 

SHARE
Login Register now

Currently 2 Responses

  • 1.
  • SAVE BEER CAN ISLAND OR NOT?

    I have walked from Whitney Beach to Beer Can (Greer) Island along the Gulf beach since 1992 and in the last 10 years or so have seen most of the beach and Australian Pines wash away due to sand erosion. I am writing you now in response to a recent op-ed and letter to the editor in a recent LBK paper.

    I’ve been following the beach re-nourishment and Beer Can Island problem for years. Many residents and visitors walk and enjoy the unique natural habitat of Beer Can. Do many residents and visitors want to save the rest of the beautiful, natural North End of Longboat Key? I think so.

    A year ago I wrote a letter to a local newspaper about the success story of adding a second jetty to the Barnegat Inlet in New Jersey. The jetty totally solved the inlet and erosion problem there, including saving the Barnegat Lighthouse!

    There are some local residents and some LBK and county commissioners who are against a second jetty on the south side of the Longboat Pass, saying that it would not work and would destroy the “natural” environment, I’m not a jetty fan, but if a south jetty is not installed soon there will not be any natural environment or Beer Can Island left to see! It will be washed away!

    In a recent local newspaper article against jetties, a long list of “experts” say that jettys don’t work. My Comment: There are hundreds of two jetty inlets built and operating successfully in the country and just as many organizations that report on their success.

    There have been many studies done by private companies and government agencies regarding the pros and cons of single and double jettys. From my reading and actual observation the success at Barnegat Inlet and the failure at LBK, and as a practical engineer, a second jetty stabilizes the channel and protects the adjacent barrier islands or keys.

    I hope logic prevails and we move swiftly toward following the recommendations of our town consultants and install a second jetty at Longboat Pass and save Beer Can Island.

    I also hope that you and the commissioners follow through and re-nourish the beach in the future with white sand regardless of cost.

    Thank you,
    Herman Kruegle
    Longboat Key, FL
    North Beach, NJ

  •  
  • Herman Kruegle
    Sun 28th Jul 2013
    at 4:40pm
  • 2.
  • Love this headline!!!
  •  
  • elaine briggs
    Wed 24th Jul 2013
    at 2:06pm
Login below to post a comment or click register.
Account E-Mail
Password
forgot password? click here
Speak Your Mind Below!


1970 Main Street, Sarasota, FL 34236 941-366-3468

Copyright 2014 The Observer Group Inc., All Rights Reserved