Term limit rules questioned


Term limit rules questioned


Date: October 14, 2009
by: Kurt Schultheis | City Editor


Mayor Lee Rothenberg may not have to step down in March after all.

If a proposal by Vice Mayor Robert Siekmann receives positive reviews by his fellow commissioners at the Thursday, Nov. 19 regular workshop, Rothenberg may be allowed to run for another two-year term.

Siekmann’s proposal stems from a resolution that the commission adopted in 2006.

The resolution allowed Commissioner Peter O’Connor to finish out two months of a partial term without affecting his ability to run for three consecutive two-year terms once his partial term ended.

Town Attorney David Persson crafted the resolution after O’Connor expressed a desire to fill the partial term as long as it didn’t count against his future full terms.

The resolution also allowed Commissioner George Spoll, who served three months of a partial term starting in December 2004, to serve three, consecutive terms that will expire in March 2011.

But Rothenberg served a partial term before the resolution was adopted.

The mayor served a partial term starting in October 2004 and then was forced to run for his District 1 seat in March 2005 for the remainder of the term that only had one year left. And Rothenberg had to run again for his seat in March 2006. Therefore, Rothenberg will have lost five months of service when he steps down in March because of term-limit rules.

Spoll and O’Connor, meanwhile, were able to serve three consecutive two-year terms (if O’Connor is re-elected in March), plus whatever length of time they were appointed for a partial term.

Siekmann would like the resolution to be amended, allowing commissioners to serve the remainder of a partial term and still be eligible for three consecutive two-year terms once the partial term expires.

Siekmann believes amending the resolution would possibly entice newcomers who would come forward to fill partial terms in the future if commissioners resign.

“Every commissioner should have the right to three consecutive two-year terms,” Siekmann said. “We should encourage people to accept appointments by letting them know they won’t be a lame duck that will have to run for their existing seat in less than a year’s time.”

Rothenberg, who could not be reached for comment, has not made it known whether he would consider running for an additional term if the resolution were amended.

Meanwhile, O’Connor and Spoll were not in favor of Siekmann’s suggestion.

O’Connor said he would consider the proposal if it were brought to the commission’s attention.

“But I’m not sure if I would be supportive of that,” O’Connor said.

Spoll refuted the suggestion altogether.

“The present policy is perfectly appropriate,” Spoll said.

Login Register now

Currently 1 Response

  • 1.
  • A Commissioner should be limited to 3 two year terms, period. 4 term Hal, who is now running for a 5th term should have been stopped when he applied for a 4th term; however by sitting out for 2 years was allowed to start all over again and thus could become 6th term Hal.
  • Lee Pokoik
    Wed 14th Oct 2009
    at 11:23am
Login below to post a comment or click register.
Account E-Mail
forgot password? click here
Speak Your Mind Below!


Subscribe to our eNewsletters
1970 Main Street, Sarasota, FL 34236 941-366-3468

Copyright 2015 The Observer Group Inc., All Rights Reserved