Code Enforcement staff builds case for challenge

 

Code Enforcement staff builds case for challenge

 

Date: July 14, 2010
by: Robin Hartill | Community Editor

 
 

Town officials allege that Key resident James Armstrong installed updates to his home without obtaining the necessary building permits. But at the Longboat Key Code Enforcement Board’s meeting Monday, July 12, Armstrong took issue with what types of work had been performed at his home, located in the 2900 block of Gulf of Mexico Drive, and whether he needed to obtain permits.

Sarasota attorney Bill Pomeroy, who represented the town in the case, presented testimony at the meeting from Code Enforcement Officer Heidi Micale, Building Inspector Tony Sapuppo and Interim Building Official John Fernandez about the ongoing case.

According to testimony and case notes, Micale received a call on April 15 from an electrician who had been hired to work on Armstrong’s property and wanted to know if Armstrong had obtained permits for the project. Micale found no active permits, and the most recent permit for the property was dated June 19, 2009, and was voided because Armstrong had never picked it up. After receiving the call, Micale and Sapuppo visited the property and “observed a large, construction Dumpster with a ladder leaning against it and a black construction-type trailer,” according to case notes.

Because the house is surrounded by concrete walls and a gate, Micale said she and Sapuppo weren’t able to knock on the front door, and they didn’t get an answer when they pushed a button on the gate’s keypad to call the owner. Sapuppo noticed that the plywood ceiling on the lanai roof appeared to be new, and Micale climbed up the ladder leaning against the Dumpster and took photos of items on the property, including an electrical wire, wooden planks and a portion of the main sewer metal drain.

Case notes state that Armstrong responded to a message from Micale and agreed to allow her to come to his property for inspection. At a later meeting, town officials made a preliminary list of work that they said had been done on the home without permits, including walls, windows, pool cage, electrical alterations, a new shed, a cage with a wooden rooftop and fan and plumbing.

On May 25, Micale prepared a notice of code violation when she found that Armstrong had still not submitted a building-permit application.

According to case notes, Armstrong said that the town’s website provided contradictory information about permitting issues, and he told Micale that staff members misrepresented permitting requirements.

Testifying at the hearing, Armstrong said that the shed in question is “a modified version of the old one,” and denied placing new windows in the house or removing floors or railings. He said that he intends to obtain necessary permits but wants clarity and doesn’t feel that he should have to provide access to his residence. He also accused town staff of trespassing to obtain photographic evidence.

“There’s some serious violations of my rights as a property owner here,” he said.

After the testimony, the Code Enforcement Board approved a motion to return to the case at its August meeting for consideration of fines and to address the compliance issue.

Contact Robin Hartill at rhartill@yourobserver.com.
 

SHARE
Login Register now

Currently 3 Responses

  • 1.
  • I think the official"s overstepped their boundry"s and violated the owner"s civil right"s it seem"s that more and more local government has gone to extreme"s and even broken the law to get their way without being held accountable for their actions.It"s a sad day when a person tries to improve his home and is viciously pursued by the township in the name of the" law".
  •  
  • frank l
    Sat 17th Jul 2010
    at 7:57pm
  • 2.
  • I thought that when a person hired a "professional" as this man apparently did, the "professional" takes care of any required permits. Why is code enforcement going after a homeowner when they should be questioning this electrician. It is his electrician's qualifications and motivativations which should be investigated..
    The 4th Amendment protects this homeowner from illegal searches.
    ENFORCE THAT!
  •  
  • christine marfut
    Thu 15th Jul 2010
    at 7:53pm
  • 3.
  • I am familiar with this house. The owner did a fantastic job of updating an otherwise ordinary looking house into one that sparkles. The owner should be applauded by the Code Enforcement Board not hounded by it.
  •  
  • Milan Adrian
    Wed 14th Jul 2010
    at 11:23am
Login below to post a comment or click register.
Account E-Mail
Password
forgot password? click here
Speak Your Mind Below!

Classifieds

1970 Main Street, Sarasota, FL 34236 941-366-3468

Copyright 2014 The Observer Group Inc., All Rights Reserved